EARLY TERMINATION OF HYUNDAI TRADEMARKS IN RUSSIA
Hyundai Motor Company filed five claims against our client, AUTOlogistics LLC (cases Nos. А41-82315/14, А41-33754/2015, А41-33742/15, А41-44653/15, А41-51834/15) seeking to ban parallel import of car spare parts to Russia. Hyundai’s position was heavily burdened by limitation of competition factor, hence we advised our client to go to Intellectual Property Court claiming that Hyundai’s trademarks be refused protection in Russia. Intellectual Property Court ruled in favor of our client in full without reservations. Here you can view IP Court’s decision published on May 4th, 2016 together with a few extracts from the reasons for decision published on May 6th, 2016. Court Decision in Russian can be viewed here.
AQUALIFE LTD VS. FEDERAL RETAIL CHAINS
Aqualife Ltd. claimed early termination of protection of GUINESS trademark in Russia. Claim was brought against Diadgeo Ireland.
RED OCTOBER CHOCOLATE FACTORY VS. SLAVYANKA CONFECTIONERY
Red October (Unicorf) vs Slavyanka Confectionery. The case of Alenka milk bar and compensation. Case № А08-8099/2009-30 of Belgorod Region Arbitration Court.
RUSSIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION VS. DNS-NOGINSK
Case № А41-47291/2012 of the Moscow Region Arbitration Court. Russian Intellectual Property Rights Organization (VOIS) vs. DNS-Noginsk company.
MELNITSA CONCERT AGENCY VS. RUSSIAN AUTHORS' SOCIETY
We helped MELNITSA to be the first one to prove that if a singer presents an own song on stage there is no need to sign a contract with the Russian Authors' Society (RAO). Moscow Arbitration Court rulled that MELNITSA should not pay RAO in connection with MUSE concert in Russia.
EVIAN VS. MONOLIT-INVEST LTD.
Restriction of imported goods. Case № А41-39651/2009 of the Arbitration Court of Moscow Region.
+7 495 748 88 58
Russia, 119048 Moscow, Luzhniki 24-9, Suite 206
