DISPUTES WITH LAWYERS
MENS LEGIS LAW FIRM VS. KAMAZ-TRANSSERVICE LTD.
Case № А41-7649/2012 of the Moscow Region Arbitration Court. Mens Legis Law Firm vs. Kamaz-Transservice Ltd.
AUTOLOGISTIKA VS. SHVYREV & PARTNERS
Case on recovery of losses in the amount od 400 000 RUB from Shvyrev & Partners Law Firm and Daimler AG..
DA-LINK LTD VS. SUPREME ARBITRATION COURT, FEDERAL CUSTOMS AGENCY, CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS SERVICE & OTHERS
Federal Customs Agency seeks re-consideration of court orders because of their inconsistency with the set intepretation and application of law by Russian arbitration courts.
THE SECRET LETTER OF THE IP COURT
We have filed an application against the secret letter of the Intellectual Property Court in regards to parallel imports. We had to futher file a complaint against setting aside of our application.
AUTOLOGISTIKA VS. GENERAL PROCECUTOR'S OFFICE OF RUSSIA
On grounds of cancellation of rullings of the Moscow Arbitration Court.
K&K THOMAS MAURER GmbH VS. SUPREME ARBITRATION COURT
K&K Thomas Maurer GmbH referred to Moscow Arbitration Court seeking reimbursement by Russian Federation, represented by Supreme Arbitration Court, in the amount of 5 mln RUB for harm sustained through establishing specific court practice in arbitration courts.
TERMINAL-SERVICE VS. FEDERAL CUSTOMS AGENCY, SUPREME ARBITRATION COURT & KALUGA OBLAST ARBITRATION COURT
Case on reimbursement for harm from the budget of the Russian Federation.
+7 495 748 88 58
Russia, 119048 Moscow, Luzhniki 24-9, Suite 203